Its going to be difficult for me to go back to SVN. Git has made version control a cinch; I actually look forward to creating, merging and switching branches. SVN users may recall the tedious experience of working with branches.
The magic is in the "distributed" approach that Git takes. What this means is that, you can actually get the entire history of your remote repo and store it locally (with SVN, you'd only have the latest revision, and not the whole history). Changes can be made locally, without needing to go online. It is only when you push local commits to the remote repo (so that others can fetch and merge your changes) that you need internet connectivity.
I actually remember that in my previous company, where we used SVN, sometimes, the server would go down and you'd be stuck, unable to commit and collaborate until the problem was fixed. With Git, this could've been circumvented if somebody had just pushed his copy to another server, since this copy would essentially contain the whole history of the project.
One of my favourite Git features is to stash changes. Essentially, users can choose to store their current working changes away and switch to another task immediately. They can later unstash and continue working on the older task.
Also, specific commits can be cherry picked to be applied to a different branch, partial file commits are possible- the possibilities are endless.
The only downside is that the learning curve is slightly steep initially. This shouldn't deter developers though, as the whole experience of switching from SVN to Git is immensely rewarding.